CalPhotos    Photo Database

Leptosiphon androsaceus   

Contributors      Log In  
 

click photo for larger file
Leptosiphon androsaceus
Leptosiphon androsaceus
Photographer: Julie Kierstead

ID: 0000 0000 0609 0942 (2009-06-05)

Copyright © 2009 Julie Kierstead Nelson

 
INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THE PHOTO
  • date of photo  Apr 18, 2009
  • location   Bailey Cove trail, east of I-5, north side of Shasta Lake (Shasta County, California, US)
  • family Polemoniaceae
  • photo category: Plant - annual/perennial

  • MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PLANT
  • Look for Jepson Manual treatments, maps (University & Jepson Herbaria)
  • View Calflora record for Leptosiphon androsaceus
  • View all photos in CalPhotos of Leptosiphon androsaceus
  • Check Google Images for Leptosiphon androsaceus


  • Reviewers' comments about this photo (review or add another comment)
    1. Reviewed by Randall Morgan    Nov 25, 2012

    Action: changed name from "Linanthus parviflorus" to "Leptosiphon sp. "

    Reviewer's comments:
         "If this is L. parv. it looks peculiar. Did you collect specimens or could you describe the loc., habitat etc.?"

    2. Reviewed by Randall Morgan    Dec 1, 2012

    Action: changed name from "Leptosiphon sp." to "Leptosiphon androsaceus "

    Reviewer's comments:
         "This population has been vouchered several times (Oswald, Ahart et al.) and keyed to L. parviflorus and L. latisectus but matches neither in morphology or in distribution. Lavender forms of parviflorus have not been found north of Monterey County, and the nearest parv of any kind is in Butte Co. and is always white. This location is also far north and east of most L. androsaceus but is clearly that species (lavender corolla with bicolored throat, stigma scarcely or not exserted, heads few-fld. and leaflets few and broad in middle. In fact it closely matches populations from the southern end of the species' range rather than the northern form, right down to the (apparently) pubescent calyces of at least some plants - this could be the reason it was keyed to L. parvif. If the calyx is actually glandular as well it would be strange, but still L. androsaceus nonetheless. It would also not be surprising if this colony is in part shade, another way L. andr. differs from the other 2 species. The southern morphol. affinities of this plant gives cause to wonder about its origins...possibly even introduced? In any case this appears to be the only record for L. andr. from Shasta Co., but same would be true also of L. latisectus or L. parviflorus. Coincidentally, Butte Co. also has a single, even more "extralimital" record of L. andro., at Ahart Ranch (now extirpated by grass competition). This picture really had me confused for a while."

     
    Using this photo   The thumbnail photo (128x192 pixels) on this page may be freely used for personal or academic purposes without prior permission under the Fair Use provisions of US copyright law as long as the photo is clearly credited with © 2009 Julie Kierstead Nelson. For other uses, or if you have questions, contact Julie Kierstead daffodil.jones[AT]gmail.com. (Replace the [AT] with the @ symbol before sending an email.)


     

    Copyright © 1995-2023 UC Regents. All rights reserved.

    CalPhotos is a project of BNHM     University of California, Berkeley